Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
So fucking over our allies...
just to placate the fucking Russians is Obama's view of being a good global citizen???
Is there ANY ally at this point he hasn't thumbed in the eye and any dictator or thug who's cock he hasnt blown yet???
Is there ANY ally at this point he hasn't thumbed in the eye and any dictator or thug who's cock he hasnt blown yet???
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Woo Hoo!!!
Ted Kennedy is finally dead!
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Worst impact he had on America was helping get the immigration laws changed in the 60s.
Second worst was helping get the financial support of South Vietnam cut off.
Then, we have his majestic slander of Judge Bork:
Burn in hell you fucking piece of shit.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Worst impact he had on America was helping get the immigration laws changed in the 60s.
Second worst was helping get the financial support of South Vietnam cut off.
Then, we have his majestic slander of Judge Bork:
Burn in hell you fucking piece of shit.
Friday, August 14, 2009
How in the fuck...
does "Squeaky" Fromme get let out of prison? She tried to kill the president! Admittedly, it was Ford, but still!
Thursday, August 6, 2009
More taxing shenanigans
LINK
The Congressional Budget Office projects a total additional deficit of approximately $4.9 trillion dollars during President Obama's first term (2009-2012). Currently, the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay 40 percent of the tax, or $450 billion a year, or approximately $1.8 trillion dollars during the next four years, leaving a $3.1 trillion hole. Increasing the tax rate on those high earners to 100 percent might yield an additional $1.5 trillion the first year, but this will only work for the first year. Most people, after being taxed 100 percent on their income, will quit work and/or put their investments in nontaxable entities, such as tax-free local government bonds.
It is also not mathematically possible to take care of all the new spending by increasing taxes on the top 5 percent of taxpayers (those making $160,000 or more annually) who already pay 61 percent of the federal tax (or $676 billion per year). Most of these people are now paying close to the revenue maximizing rate, which means that any increase in their tax rate is unlikely over the long run to bring in much more tax revenue.
Quite simply, upper-income people have options. History shows that when tax rates are raised, many will choose to work less (leisure is nontaxable), retire earlier than they had planned and save and invest less in taxable, productive activities. Those making more than $160,000 per year would need to have their taxes roughly tripled to take care of just this year's deficit. (One merely has to look at the tax evasion practiced by the chairman of the congressional tax writing committee, the secretary of the Treasury and the former majority leader, et al. at today's tax rates to know that they and their colleagues, as well as most everyone else, will find either legal or illegal ways to avoid paying the tax.)
The Congressional Budget Office projects a total additional deficit of approximately $4.9 trillion dollars during President Obama's first term (2009-2012). Currently, the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay 40 percent of the tax, or $450 billion a year, or approximately $1.8 trillion dollars during the next four years, leaving a $3.1 trillion hole. Increasing the tax rate on those high earners to 100 percent might yield an additional $1.5 trillion the first year, but this will only work for the first year. Most people, after being taxed 100 percent on their income, will quit work and/or put their investments in nontaxable entities, such as tax-free local government bonds.
It is also not mathematically possible to take care of all the new spending by increasing taxes on the top 5 percent of taxpayers (those making $160,000 or more annually) who already pay 61 percent of the federal tax (or $676 billion per year). Most of these people are now paying close to the revenue maximizing rate, which means that any increase in their tax rate is unlikely over the long run to bring in much more tax revenue.
Quite simply, upper-income people have options. History shows that when tax rates are raised, many will choose to work less (leisure is nontaxable), retire earlier than they had planned and save and invest less in taxable, productive activities. Those making more than $160,000 per year would need to have their taxes roughly tripled to take care of just this year's deficit. (One merely has to look at the tax evasion practiced by the chairman of the congressional tax writing committee, the secretary of the Treasury and the former majority leader, et al. at today's tax rates to know that they and their colleagues, as well as most everyone else, will find either legal or illegal ways to avoid paying the tax.)
Damn dirty hippies
Weather stations give flawed temperature data, meteorologist claims
By: Kevin Mooney
Commentary Staff Writer
08/06/09 12:34 AM EDT
Researchers who have inspected climate monitoring stations across the U.S. have found that almost 90 percent of the weather monitoring stations have failed to meet National Weather Service requirements.
Anthony Watts, a retired meteorologist, and a team of over 650 volunteers, photographically documented 1003 out of 1,221 of the climate monitoring stations managed by the U.S. Weather Service. The results of this survey show that the temperature cited as proof of man-made global warming is laced with false biases in favor of alarmism.
“We found stations located next to exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, on blistering-hot rooftops, and near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat,” Watts said. “We found 68 stations located at wastewater treatment plants, where the process of waste digestion causes temperatures to be higher than in surrounding areas.”
The research team also determined that 89 percent did not measure up to the National Weather Service’s requirement that stations must be 30 meters (about 100 feet) or more away from an artificial heating source. This means almost 9 out of every 10 stations are reporting higher temperatures because they are badly sited.
“The errors in the record exceed by a wide margin the purported rise in temperatures of 0.7 degrees C (about 1.2 degrees F) during the twentieth century,” Watts said.
An analysis of 948 stations rated as of May 31, 2009, Watts estimates that 22 percent of stations have an expected error of 1 degree C, 61 percent have an expected error of 2 degrees C, and 8 percent have an expected error of 5 degrees C.
“This record should not be cited as evidence of any trend in temperature that may have occurred across the U.S. during the past century,” he said. “Since the U.S. record is thought to be `the best in the world,’ it follows that the global database is likely similarly compromised and unreliable.”
By: Kevin Mooney
Commentary Staff Writer
08/06/09 12:34 AM EDT
Researchers who have inspected climate monitoring stations across the U.S. have found that almost 90 percent of the weather monitoring stations have failed to meet National Weather Service requirements.
Anthony Watts, a retired meteorologist, and a team of over 650 volunteers, photographically documented 1003 out of 1,221 of the climate monitoring stations managed by the U.S. Weather Service. The results of this survey show that the temperature cited as proof of man-made global warming is laced with false biases in favor of alarmism.
“We found stations located next to exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, on blistering-hot rooftops, and near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat,” Watts said. “We found 68 stations located at wastewater treatment plants, where the process of waste digestion causes temperatures to be higher than in surrounding areas.”
The research team also determined that 89 percent did not measure up to the National Weather Service’s requirement that stations must be 30 meters (about 100 feet) or more away from an artificial heating source. This means almost 9 out of every 10 stations are reporting higher temperatures because they are badly sited.
“The errors in the record exceed by a wide margin the purported rise in temperatures of 0.7 degrees C (about 1.2 degrees F) during the twentieth century,” Watts said.
An analysis of 948 stations rated as of May 31, 2009, Watts estimates that 22 percent of stations have an expected error of 1 degree C, 61 percent have an expected error of 2 degrees C, and 8 percent have an expected error of 5 degrees C.
“This record should not be cited as evidence of any trend in temperature that may have occurred across the U.S. during the past century,” he said. “Since the U.S. record is thought to be `the best in the world,’ it follows that the global database is likely similarly compromised and unreliable.”
Ca$h for Clunker$
I guess that I was out of the country when this thing started but I did see a Dodge commercial that was talking about the program. I guess the program is almost over which sucks because I would like to get a truck and I always buy American. I have heard a little about this program and aside from the fact that you are paying people to buy American cars with what I am guessing is bailout or bailout v2.0 money it seems fairly straight forward. Do you guys think that it was a great success that it only lasted a week or a mismanagement of funds.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Taxing shenanigans.
IRS data shows that in 2007—the most recent data available—the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 40.4 percent of the total income taxes collected by the federal government. This is the highest percentage in modern history. By contrast, the top 1 percent paid 24.8 percent of the income tax burden in 1987, the year following the 1986 tax reform act.
Remarkably, the share of the tax burden borne by the top 1 percent now exceeds the share paid by the bottom 95 percent of taxpayers combined. In 2007, the bottom 95 percent paid 39.4 percent of the income tax burden. This is down from the 58 percent of the total income tax burden they paid twenty years ago.
To put this in perspective, the top 1 percent is comprised of just 1.4 million taxpayers and they pay a larger share of the income tax burden now than the bottom 134 million taxpayers combined.
Remarkably, the share of the tax burden borne by the top 1 percent now exceeds the share paid by the bottom 95 percent of taxpayers combined. In 2007, the bottom 95 percent paid 39.4 percent of the income tax burden. This is down from the 58 percent of the total income tax burden they paid twenty years ago.
To put this in perspective, the top 1 percent is comprised of just 1.4 million taxpayers and they pay a larger share of the income tax burden now than the bottom 134 million taxpayers combined.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Sign #253 That I'm Getting Old
I think Sarah Palin is HOTTTTTTTTTT! I blame MSNBC and the images they've been running all day.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
You stay classy, BHO.
He's really becoming Jimmy Carter redux, but while still in office.
To: Jon Favreau [speechwriterman@aol.com]
Subject: Re: some suggestions
Thanks, Jon. I don't think "Consolidation of Challenges" has quite the same ring as "Axis of Evil", do you? I like "Triumvirate of Malfeasance" though - imagine Bush trying to say that one - but that means we have to have three. I was thinking bankers, Afghanistan/Pakistan and pirates. Hillary wanted to stick North Korea in there, but I managed to convince her they'd only be flattered. Barack
To: Jon Favreau [speechwriterman@aol.com]
Subject: Re: some suggestions
Thanks, Jon. I don't think "Consolidation of Challenges" has quite the same ring as "Axis of Evil", do you? I like "Triumvirate of Malfeasance" though - imagine Bush trying to say that one - but that means we have to have three. I was thinking bankers, Afghanistan/Pakistan and pirates. Hillary wanted to stick North Korea in there, but I managed to convince her they'd only be flattered. Barack
Monday, April 20, 2009
Damn dirty hippies!!! Bring back DDT!!
From DDT to Dursban [Henry Payne]
Detroit, Mich. — Greens can take a bow: Bedbugs are back with a vengeance.
Responding to the biggest bedbug outbreak since World War II, the Environmental Protection Agency hosted its first-ever “bedbug summit” Tuesday outside Washington to address a widening public outcry. Some of the most vulnerable communities are inner cities like Detroit, and the major culprit, as it turns out, was the summit host.
Nine years ago, the zealots at Bill Clinton’s EPA banned the pesticide chlorpyrifos (to widespread media and environmentalist hosannas), the most commonly available household product in the world to address bedbugs, cockroaches, and other nuisances. Better known by its trade name, Dursban, chlorpyrifos had been available for 30 years in some 800 products in 88 countries around the world.
But despite widespread protest in the scientific community, EPA Chief Carol Browner erased Dursban from the shelves. “EPA has gone to great lengths to present a highly conservative, worst case, hypothetical risk based in large part on dubious extrapolations . . . and exaggerated risk estimates,” said Michigan State University toxicologist J. I. Goodman in a typical response.
Even Dr. Alan Hoberman, the principal researcher whose data Browner cited, told the Detroit News he disputed the agency's interpretation of his findings.
Such critics were also ignored by the press — as was evidence that the nation’s urban poor would be most vulnerable to a ban. Children insect-bite allergies and cockroach-induced allergens outnumber pesticide poisoning by 100:1. “Hardest hit will be lower-income families in cities like Detroit, who can ill afford a weekly house call from the Orkin man,” warned News writer Diane Katz, now with the Fraser Institute. “Yet that is precisely what the EPA is recommending as a substitute for a couple squirts from a can of bug spray.”
Nine years on, Greg Baumann — Senior Scientist at the National Test Management Association — confirms that the Dursban void has been largely unfilled, leaving millions to fight pests with less convenient preventative measures. Extermination, for example, costs between $400 and $900 — out of reach for low-income Detroit families.
And those accountable for this predictable disaster? The very media outlets who were cheerleading the EPA ban now feign ignorance. “Out of concern for the environment and the effects on public health, the EPA has banned many of the chemicals that were most effective in eradicating the bugs in the U.S.,” shrugs the AP in graph ten of its story.
And the EPA Administrator who approved the ban? Browner has been promoted to “climate czar” in the Obama administration.
Detroit, Mich. — Greens can take a bow: Bedbugs are back with a vengeance.
Responding to the biggest bedbug outbreak since World War II, the Environmental Protection Agency hosted its first-ever “bedbug summit” Tuesday outside Washington to address a widening public outcry. Some of the most vulnerable communities are inner cities like Detroit, and the major culprit, as it turns out, was the summit host.
Nine years ago, the zealots at Bill Clinton’s EPA banned the pesticide chlorpyrifos (to widespread media and environmentalist hosannas), the most commonly available household product in the world to address bedbugs, cockroaches, and other nuisances. Better known by its trade name, Dursban, chlorpyrifos had been available for 30 years in some 800 products in 88 countries around the world.
But despite widespread protest in the scientific community, EPA Chief Carol Browner erased Dursban from the shelves. “EPA has gone to great lengths to present a highly conservative, worst case, hypothetical risk based in large part on dubious extrapolations . . . and exaggerated risk estimates,” said Michigan State University toxicologist J. I. Goodman in a typical response.
Even Dr. Alan Hoberman, the principal researcher whose data Browner cited, told the Detroit News he disputed the agency's interpretation of his findings.
Such critics were also ignored by the press — as was evidence that the nation’s urban poor would be most vulnerable to a ban. Children insect-bite allergies and cockroach-induced allergens outnumber pesticide poisoning by 100:1. “Hardest hit will be lower-income families in cities like Detroit, who can ill afford a weekly house call from the Orkin man,” warned News writer Diane Katz, now with the Fraser Institute. “Yet that is precisely what the EPA is recommending as a substitute for a couple squirts from a can of bug spray.”
Nine years on, Greg Baumann — Senior Scientist at the National Test Management Association — confirms that the Dursban void has been largely unfilled, leaving millions to fight pests with less convenient preventative measures. Extermination, for example, costs between $400 and $900 — out of reach for low-income Detroit families.
And those accountable for this predictable disaster? The very media outlets who were cheerleading the EPA ban now feign ignorance. “Out of concern for the environment and the effects on public health, the EPA has banned many of the chemicals that were most effective in eradicating the bugs in the U.S.,” shrugs the AP in graph ten of its story.
And the EPA Administrator who approved the ban? Browner has been promoted to “climate czar” in the Obama administration.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Dear Listener,
This is an automated response from NPR's Morning Edition. The production staff has received your message and it will be processed shortly.
Thank you,
NPR Services
Message Information:
Message #: 5607-8543705
Date Created: 4/17/2009 8:34 AM EDT
Subject: Please quit referring to them as "torture" memos.
Body: Dear Morning Edition,
If slapping someone or putting them in a box of caterpillars is torture, then every big brother ever is guilty. You do a disservice to victims of actual, real torture by equating harsh and distasteful acts with vivisection, dismemberment, electrocution and other truly heinous acts.
Thanks,
Kevin Hudson
Raleigh NC
Thank you,
NPR Services
Message Information:
Message #: 5607-8543705
Date Created: 4/17/2009 8:34 AM EDT
Subject: Please quit referring to them as "torture" memos.
Body: Dear Morning Edition,
If slapping someone or putting them in a box of caterpillars is torture, then every big brother ever is guilty. You do a disservice to victims of actual, real torture by equating harsh and distasteful acts with vivisection, dismemberment, electrocution and other truly heinous acts.
Thanks,
Kevin Hudson
Raleigh NC
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Geebus.
Now let me just preface this by saying that I'm a convincable believer in deficit spending IF interest rates are less than GDP -- its basically free money. Running a 2-3% deficit when GDP was 4-6% never really bugged me. Granted, thats really all I've known in my life BUT... this is shocking.
A trillion here, a trillion there and soon we're talking about some real money.
A trillion here, a trillion there and soon we're talking about some real money.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
I know I don't normally post here, but...
is it safe to say that Bev Perdue has already established herself as one of the worst governor's in the history of our fair state?
Just reading the article about our Superintendent of Public Schools, and wow. That's a very Nixonian play by Mrs. Perdue there; the old "I know you're the elected official, but I've created this appointed position with the exact same powers as yours, so you can just go along now" play.
I'm not even sure I understand all of the financial stuff she's doing right now (the taking of cash from various coffers to pay for different governmental programs), but she sure seems to have pissed a lot of people off really early in her tenure.
Just reading the article about our Superintendent of Public Schools, and wow. That's a very Nixonian play by Mrs. Perdue there; the old "I know you're the elected official, but I've created this appointed position with the exact same powers as yours, so you can just go along now" play.
I'm not even sure I understand all of the financial stuff she's doing right now (the taking of cash from various coffers to pay for different governmental programs), but she sure seems to have pissed a lot of people off really early in her tenure.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Hmmm.... not sure how to feel about this
Electricity Grid in U.S. Penetrated By Spies
From MY limited experience, the reason I doubt the veracity of this is that most of the SCADA networks are not physically connected to even the private networks.
Maybe I'm wrong.
From MY limited experience, the reason I doubt the veracity of this is that most of the SCADA networks are not physically connected to even the private networks.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Expiration date politics
Last week:
"Today, we've learned the lessons of history," President Obama said yesterday in London, sounding like the staunchest free-marketer denouncing the government's protectionist response in 1930, which deeply worsened the Great Depression.
"We have rejected the protectionism that could deepen this crisis," he said. "History tells us that turning inward can help turn a downturn into a depression."
Today:
United States Imposes Tariffs on Softwood Lumber from Four Canadian Provinces Due to Canada’s Failure to Comply with the Softwood Lumber Agreement
"Today, we've learned the lessons of history," President Obama said yesterday in London, sounding like the staunchest free-marketer denouncing the government's protectionist response in 1930, which deeply worsened the Great Depression.
"We have rejected the protectionism that could deepen this crisis," he said. "History tells us that turning inward can help turn a downturn into a depression."
Today:
United States Imposes Tariffs on Softwood Lumber from Four Canadian Provinces Due to Canada’s Failure to Comply with the Softwood Lumber Agreement
I cannot fathom what kind of idiots we have in charge of our lives.
The idea that we can get 100% of our energy from wind is such lunacy I dont even know where to start.
How would the power get transmitted efficiently from tens of thousands of windmills to individual homes?
How would the power get generated when its needed? There is currently NO way to efficiently store electricity, thats why its so expensive to produce "peak" energy.
How would damn dirty hippies react to the idea of tens of thousands of windmills out in the ocean or solar panels in the desert killing wildlife???
We are so fucked.
How would the power get transmitted efficiently from tens of thousands of windmills to individual homes?
How would the power get generated when its needed? There is currently NO way to efficiently store electricity, thats why its so expensive to produce "peak" energy.
How would damn dirty hippies react to the idea of tens of thousands of windmills out in the ocean or solar panels in the desert killing wildlife???
We are so fucked.
Monday, April 6, 2009
Everything he says should come with an expiration date
Barack Obama goes ahead with missile defence shield despite disarmament pledge
Telegraph [UK], by Toby Harnden & Bruno Waterfield
The United States would continue to develop a missile defence shield until Iran abandoned its nuclear ambitions, President Barack Obama said in the Czech Republic. "As long as the threat from Iran persists, we will go forward with a missile defence system that is cost-effective and proven," he told a crowd of about 20,000 gathered in Hradcany Square, next to Prague Castle.
Just days before the expected launch of a North Korean missile in violation of the spirit if not the letter of every agreement Pyongyang has ever signed with the international community, Barack Obama's Pentagon will release a budget that guts the U.S. Missile Defense Agency.
Telegraph [UK], by Toby Harnden & Bruno Waterfield
The United States would continue to develop a missile defence shield until Iran abandoned its nuclear ambitions, President Barack Obama said in the Czech Republic. "As long as the threat from Iran persists, we will go forward with a missile defence system that is cost-effective and proven," he told a crowd of about 20,000 gathered in Hradcany Square, next to Prague Castle.
Just days before the expected launch of a North Korean missile in violation of the spirit if not the letter of every agreement Pyongyang has ever signed with the international community, Barack Obama's Pentagon will release a budget that guts the U.S. Missile Defense Agency.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
What the fuck ???????????????
Hundreds mourn man who killed police officers
San Francisco Chronicle, by Leslie Fulbright
Nearly 500 people gathered at an East Oakland church Tuesday to say goodbye to Lovelle Mixon, the 26-year-old parolee who was killed by police after he went on a shooting rampage that left four Oakland officers dead. The open-casket service, held at Fuller Funerals on International Boulevard, was about an hour long and had such a large turnout that a number of guests were forced to stand.
San Francisco Chronicle, by Leslie Fulbright
Nearly 500 people gathered at an East Oakland church Tuesday to say goodbye to Lovelle Mixon, the 26-year-old parolee who was killed by police after he went on a shooting rampage that left four Oakland officers dead. The open-casket service, held at Fuller Funerals on International Boulevard, was about an hour long and had such a large turnout that a number of guests were forced to stand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
